95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
82.05%
Net income growth above 1.5x RGLD's 29.23%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
104.09%
D&A growth of 104.09% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
100.00%
Some yoy growth while RGLD is negative at -869.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-24.94%
Negative yoy SBC while RGLD is 76.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-260.68%
Negative yoy working capital usage while RGLD is 60.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.00%
Negative yoy while RGLD is 26.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
71.55%
Operating cash flow growth at 75-90% of RGLD's 87.34%. Bill Ackman would recommend further refinements to match competitor’s CFO gains.
-16656.97%
Negative yoy CapEx while RGLD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with RGLD at -38.60%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-16197.05%
We reduce yoy invests while RGLD stands at 438.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.