PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
51.37%
Net income growth above 1.5x RGLD's 13.47%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
13.80%
Some D&A expansion while RGLD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.04%
Less SBC growth vs. RGLD's 68.43%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
312.06%
Slight usage while RGLD is negative at -347.74%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
429.88%
Well above RGLD's 19.93%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
56.41%
Some CFO growth while RGLD is negative at -27.78%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
98.98%
CapEx growth of 98.98% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
51.72%
Acquisition growth of 51.72% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-379.17%
Both yoy lines negative, with RGLD at -99.71%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
96.81%
We have mild expansions while RGLD is negative at -99.71%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while RGLD is 64.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.