95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-79.93%
Negative net income growth while RGLD stands at 92.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
4.87%
Some D&A expansion while RGLD is negative at -3.59%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
2028.04%
Well above RGLD's 181.74% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
468.64%
SBC growth while RGLD is negative at -33.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
264.57%
Well above RGLD's 15.05% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-119.34%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with RGLD at -144.24%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
AP growth well above RGLD's 26.95%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
1196.43%
Growth well above RGLD's 2.89%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-185.37%
Both negative yoy, with RGLD at -3.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
0.04%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of RGLD's 31.80%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
99.89%
Some CapEx rise while RGLD is negative at -1633.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while RGLD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-348.28%
Both yoy lines negative, with RGLD at -2821.49%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
99.78%
We have mild expansions while RGLD is negative at -2792.74%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-316.07%
We cut debt repayment yoy while RGLD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.