95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
116.27%
Some net income increase while RGLD is negative at -3.27%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
7.88%
Some D&A expansion while RGLD is negative at -0.42%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
58.43%
Well above RGLD's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
33.34%
SBC growth well above RGLD's 14.11%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-161.59%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RGLD at -90.70%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-146.54%
AR is negative yoy while RGLD is 80.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-124.51%
Negative yoy AP while RGLD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-182.38%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RGLD at -85.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-8516.17%
Both negative yoy, with RGLD at -103.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-2.98%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with RGLD at -8.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-16744.65%
Negative yoy CapEx while RGLD is 93.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.10%
Purchases growth of 100.10% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
2516.86%
Liquidation growth of 2516.86% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
144.26%
Growth well above RGLD's 108.65%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-4026.39%
We reduce yoy invests while RGLD stands at 94.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-0.51%
We cut debt repayment yoy while RGLD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
932.90%
Issuance growth of 932.90% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.