PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-46.04%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with RGLD at -3.23%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-3.38%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with RGLD at -5.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-2.19%
Negative yoy deferred tax while RGLD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
79.42%
SBC growth well above RGLD's 23.85%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-482.86%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RGLD at -2433.49%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-1119.88%
AR is negative yoy while RGLD is 150.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
117.96%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. RGLD's 407.82%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-231.38%
Negative yoy AP while RGLD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
14.21%
Some yoy usage while RGLD is negative at -3308.90%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
100.39%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. RGLD's 2665.73%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
7.81%
Some CFO growth while RGLD is negative at -14.94%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
84.87%
Some CapEx rise while RGLD is negative at -135.28%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-393066.90%
Negative yoy purchasing while RGLD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while RGLD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
181.48%
We have some outflow growth while RGLD is negative at -101.64%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
76.94%
We have mild expansions while RGLD is negative at -145.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-1.52%
We cut debt repayment yoy while RGLD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
164.26%
Issuance growth of 164.26% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.