PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-32.95%
Negative net income growth while RGLD stands at 13.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-15.21%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with RGLD at -15.32%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
46.81%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. RGLD's 152.53%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-12.71%
Negative yoy SBC while RGLD is 48.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-138.38%
Negative yoy working capital usage while RGLD is 47.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-57.16%
AR is negative yoy while RGLD is 111.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-60.23%
Negative yoy inventory while RGLD is 2.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-369.57%
Negative yoy AP while RGLD is 280.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-116.73%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RGLD at -185.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
92.37%
Some yoy increase while RGLD is negative at -15.31%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-21.46%
Negative yoy CFO while RGLD is 7.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-136.94%
Negative yoy CapEx while RGLD is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-3857.59%
Negative yoy purchasing while RGLD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while RGLD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-5988.89%
Both yoy lines negative, with RGLD at -337.78%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-146.85%
We reduce yoy invests while RGLD stands at 99.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-2.54%
We cut debt repayment yoy while RGLD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
233.43%
We slightly raise equity while RGLD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
100.00%
Similar buyback growth to RGLD's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital return priorities or a stable free cash flow for both.