PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
26.98%
Some net income increase while RGLD is negative at -0.74%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.16%
Some D&A expansion while RGLD is negative at -14.51%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
193.24%
Some yoy growth while RGLD is negative at -853.75%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-39.38%
Both cut yoy SBC, with RGLD at -26.29%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
181.32%
Well above RGLD's 334.56% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
151.10%
AR growth while RGLD is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-70.23%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with RGLD at -10.80%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
113.08%
A yoy AP increase while RGLD is negative at -39.97%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-1069.64%
Negative yoy usage while RGLD is 151.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
111.57%
Some yoy increase while RGLD is negative at -14.41%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
49.79%
Some CFO growth while RGLD is negative at -0.67%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-174.62%
Negative yoy CapEx while RGLD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.62%
Purchases growth of 99.62% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.11%
We reduce yoy other investing while RGLD is 123.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-3.55%
Both yoy lines negative, with RGLD at -1231.98%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
12.38%
We repay more while RGLD is negative at -33.33%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-88.06%
Negative yoy issuance while RGLD is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.