95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-25.10%
Negative net income growth while RGLD stands at 71.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with RGLD at -7.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
59100.18%
Well above RGLD's 327.62% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
387.20%
SBC growth well above RGLD's 12.05%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-270.79%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RGLD at -120.48%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-189.88%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with RGLD at -142.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
151.69%
Lower AP growth vs. RGLD's 930.38%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-385.98%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RGLD at -119.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-49.48%
Both negative yoy, with RGLD at -6.40%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
6.73%
Some CFO growth while RGLD is negative at -17.91%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
90.09%
Some CapEx rise while RGLD is negative at -4533.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
148.54%
Growth well above RGLD's 172.13%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
128.50%
We have mild expansions while RGLD is negative at -315.90%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
0.68%
Debt repayment growth of 0.68% while RGLD is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
118.88%
Stock issuance far above RGLD's 95.40%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.