95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-89.31%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SA at -17.81%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.58%
Some D&A expansion while SA is negative at -62.75%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
127.08%
Well above SA's 184.43% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-72.04%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SA at -25.67%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
266.55%
Well above SA's 195.84% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
223.37%
AR growth well above SA's 101.80%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-174.73%
Negative yoy AP while SA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
144.39%
Growth well above SA's 2.80%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
101.73%
Some yoy increase while SA is negative at -147.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-19.81%
Negative yoy CFO while SA is 97.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
16.94%
Some CapEx rise while SA is negative at -131.20%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-377.07%
Negative yoy acquisition while SA stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-377.07%
Negative yoy purchasing while SA stands at 99.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-79.34%
We reduce yoy sales while SA is 660.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
108.52%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SA's 244.19%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-21.74%
We reduce yoy invests while SA stands at 85.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
64.56%
Debt repayment growth of 64.56% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.