PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-46.04%
Negative net income growth while SA stands at 26.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-3.38%
Negative yoy D&A while SA is 4.76%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-2.19%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
79.42%
Less SBC growth vs. SA's 300.87%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-482.86%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SA at -3.12%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-1119.88%
AR is negative yoy while SA is 124.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
117.96%
Inventory growth of 117.96% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-231.38%
Negative yoy AP while SA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
14.21%
Some yoy usage while SA is negative at -1331.83%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
100.39%
Some yoy increase while SA is negative at -112.40%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
7.81%
Some CFO growth while SA is negative at -3.11%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
84.87%
CapEx growth well above SA's 64.31%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-393066.90%
Both yoy lines negative, with SA at -1945.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while SA is 94.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
181.48%
We have some outflow growth while SA is negative at -1313.62%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
76.94%
Investing outflow well above SA's 89.31%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-1.52%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SA is 65.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
164.26%
We slightly raise equity while SA is negative at -10.50%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.