PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-32.95%
Negative net income growth while SA stands at 57.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-15.21%
Negative yoy D&A while SA is 390.91%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
46.81%
Well above SA's 37.16% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-12.71%
Negative yoy SBC while SA is 79.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-138.38%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SA is 35.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-57.16%
AR is negative yoy while SA is 12.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-60.23%
Negative yoy inventory while SA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-369.57%
Negative yoy AP while SA is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-116.73%
Negative yoy usage while SA is 35.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
92.37%
Some yoy increase while SA is negative at -55.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-21.46%
Negative yoy CFO while SA is 43.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-136.94%
Negative yoy CapEx while SA is 43.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-3857.59%
Negative yoy purchasing while SA stands at 99.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SA at -45.93%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-5988.89%
Both yoy lines negative, with SA at -765.56%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-146.85%
We reduce yoy invests while SA stands at 75.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-2.54%
Both yoy lines negative, with SA at -7.69%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
233.43%
We slightly raise equity while SA is negative at -72.25%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.