95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-25.10%
Negative net income growth while SA stands at 653.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-100.00%
Negative yoy D&A while SA is 1.05%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
59100.18%
Well above SA's 170.74% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
387.20%
SBC growth while SA is negative at -27.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-270.79%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SA at -263.41%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-189.88%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SA at -248.75%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
151.69%
AP growth of 151.69% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-385.98%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SA at -85.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-49.48%
Both negative yoy, with SA at -13345.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
6.73%
Some CFO growth while SA is negative at -838.06%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
90.09%
CapEx growth well above SA's 67.82%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
148.54%
Growth of 148.54% while SA is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
128.50%
Investing outflow well above SA's 65.48%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
0.68%
Debt repayment well below SA's 38.81%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
118.88%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. SA's 245.88%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.