PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.52%
Net income growth under 50% of SAND's 50.56%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
0.56%
D&A growth of 0.56% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
100.00%
Well above SAND's 10.85% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while SAND is 1.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
121.90%
Less working capital growth vs. SAND's 767.77%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
121.90%
Growth of 121.90% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-24.21%
Both negative yoy, with SAND at -93.58%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
5.55%
Some CFO growth while SAND is negative at -5.34%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-74.86%
Negative yoy purchasing while SAND stands at 59.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-74.86%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -43.54%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.29%
Issuance growth of 8.29% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.