PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
82.05%
Some net income increase while SAND is negative at -98.34%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
104.09%
D&A growth well above SAND's 5.26%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
100.00%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. SAND's 200.00%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-24.94%
Negative yoy SBC while SAND is 739.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-260.68%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SAND at -318.67%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.00%
Both negative yoy, with SAND at -5465.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
71.55%
Some CFO growth while SAND is negative at -220.68%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-16656.97%
Negative yoy CapEx while SAND is 96.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.41%
We reduce yoy other investing while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-16197.05%
We reduce yoy invests while SAND stands at 96.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.