PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.16%
Negative net income growth while SAND stands at 31.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-9.55%
Negative yoy D&A while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
154.30%
Deferred tax of 154.30% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
345.27%
SBC growth while SAND is negative at -8.79%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-212.21%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SAND at -187.07%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.61%
Negative yoy while SAND is 92.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-18.85%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SAND at -44.48%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
76.26%
CapEx growth well above SAND's 67.52%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.25%
Growth of 95.25% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
72.46%
Investing outflow well above SAND's 67.52%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
95.15%
Debt repayment similar to SAND's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.