PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
19.33%
Some net income increase while SAND is negative at -63.49%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
13.29%
Less D&A growth vs. SAND's 5222.13%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-342.07%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-35.10%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SAND at -72.55%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
12.04%
Less working capital growth vs. SAND's 51.61%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-100.00%
Negative yoy usage while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
92.91%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SAND's 4989.88%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
16.30%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SAND's 51.28%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
100.00%
CapEx growth well above SAND's 99.86%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1640.44%
Negative yoy purchasing while SAND stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5926.89%
We reduce yoy other investing while SAND is 99.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-1645.23%
We reduce yoy invests while SAND stands at 99.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.