PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.65%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SAND at -73.87%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-27.55%
Negative yoy D&A while SAND is 113.21%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
71.42%
Deferred tax of 71.42% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-3.54%
Negative yoy SBC while SAND is 123.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-224.67%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SAND at -191.15%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-202.82%
AR is negative yoy while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-220.37%
Negative yoy inventory while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
52.00%
AP growth of 52.00% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-164.47%
Negative yoy usage while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
99.41%
Well above SAND's 117.23%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
2.02%
Some CFO growth while SAND is negative at -7.46%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
79.91%
CapEx growth well above SAND's 51.87%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.03%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -685275.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
198.14%
Investing outflow well above SAND's 51.41%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.