PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.19%
Some net income increase while SAND is negative at -658.25%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
25.94%
Some D&A expansion while SAND is negative at -96.91%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
189.32%
Some yoy growth while SAND is negative at -18.75%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
44.54%
SBC growth while SAND is negative at -47.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
78.15%
Slight usage while SAND is negative at -9.46%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
19.73%
AR growth of 19.73% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
96.72%
Inventory growth well above SAND's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
12.50%
AP growth of 12.50% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-169.29%
Negative yoy usage while SAND is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
3888.06%
Well above SAND's 764.44%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
32.30%
Some CFO growth while SAND is negative at -172.90%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
85.96%
CapEx growth well above SAND's 81.34%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-212.50%
We reduce yoy other investing while SAND is 99.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-165.87%
We reduce yoy invests while SAND stands at 81.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.