PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-8.80%
Negative net income growth while SAND stands at 182.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-7.39%
Negative yoy D&A while SAND is 9947.37%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
272.62%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. SAND's 2089.47%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-6.28%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SAND at -15.77%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
703.82%
Well above SAND's 399.61% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-469.80%
AR is negative yoy while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
3156.14%
Growth of 3156.14% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-48.74%
Both negative yoy, with SAND at -97.23%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-0.62%
Negative yoy CFO while SAND is 826.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-34252.87%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -18.56%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.00%
We have some outflow growth while SAND is negative at -20635.71%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-877.09%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -75.39%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.