PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1.68%
Some net income increase while SAND is negative at -9.53%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.07%
Negative yoy D&A while SAND is 100.91%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
668.15%
Well above SAND's 546.61% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
6.35%
Less SBC growth vs. SAND's 38.95%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-467.98%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SAND at -199.35%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-129.63%
AR is negative yoy while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.01%
Growth of 66.01% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-0.89%
Negative yoy while SAND is 74.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
0.08%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SAND's 18.10%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-27.42%
Negative yoy CapEx while SAND is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-107.69%
We reduce yoy other investing while SAND is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-46.86%
We reduce yoy invests while SAND stands at 159.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.