PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.86%
Some net income increase while SAND is negative at -2050.02%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
2.43%
Less D&A growth vs. SAND's 114.71%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-908.46%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-59.06%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SAND at -29.33%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
178.98%
Slight usage while SAND is negative at -180.02%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
140.34%
AR growth while SAND is negative at -120.21%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
204.22%
AP growth of 204.22% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-38.67%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SAND at -196.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
21.92%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SAND's 610.23%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
4.99%
Some CFO growth while SAND is negative at -5.15%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-3394.85%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -0.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.45%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SAND's 107.58%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-375.46%
We reduce yoy invests while SAND stands at 86.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
59.22%
Debt repayment growth of 59.22% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.