PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
8.72%
Some net income increase while SAND is negative at -1730.42%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
66.29%
Some D&A expansion while SAND is negative at -99.38%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-104.43%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SAND stands at 3203.69%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-72.78%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SAND at -13.86%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
854.67%
Well above SAND's 112.95% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-85.24%
AR is negative yoy while SAND is 60.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
209.23%
AP growth of 209.23% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-3700.00%
Negative yoy usage while SAND is 60.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-95.51%
Negative yoy while SAND is 44.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
22.62%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 16.75%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
99.88%
CapEx growth well above SAND's 97.44%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-117.38%
We reduce yoy other investing while SAND is 6211.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
99.43%
Investing outflow well above SAND's 108.51%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
91.50%
Debt repayment growth of 91.50% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.