PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-278.54%
Negative net income growth while SAND stands at 59.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-15.05%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SAND at -9.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-3917.69%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
23.10%
SBC growth while SAND is negative at -6.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-85.13%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SAND is 637.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
114.34%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. SAND's 309.08%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-134.90%
Negative yoy AP while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
157.26%
Some yoy usage while SAND is negative at -131.37%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
192612.50%
Well above SAND's 13.68%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-8.92%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SAND at -13.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
49.09%
Some CapEx rise while SAND is negative at -135.23%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SAND at -77.90%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-6.92%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -273.61%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
5.10%
We have mild expansions while SAND is negative at -351.83%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
20.00%
Debt repayment growth of 20.00% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.