PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-76.45%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SAND at -356.29%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
50.21%
D&A growth well above SAND's 6.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
77.37%
Some yoy growth while SAND is negative at -3650.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
159.27%
SBC growth well above SAND's 63.50%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
552.58%
Slight usage while SAND is negative at -82.48%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
12.24%
AR growth while SAND is negative at -72.69%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
169.03%
AP growth of 169.03% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
50.75%
Growth well above SAND's 29.49%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
50.41%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SAND's 174.17%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
34.00%
Some CFO growth while SAND is negative at -39.42%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-160715.36%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -4213.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.03%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SAND's 84.69%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-18875.02%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -1119.59%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
69.12%
Debt repayment growth of 69.12% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-422.95%
We cut yoy buybacks while SAND is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.