PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
37.61%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 33.01%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
-1.54%
Negative yoy D&A while SAND is 1.96%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-332.84%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
290.50%
SBC growth well above SAND's 2.20%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
581.84%
Slight usage while SAND is negative at -36.05%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
190.63%
AR growth well above SAND's 2.28%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-71.46%
Negative yoy AP while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
140.55%
Some yoy usage while SAND is negative at -67.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
315.58%
Well above SAND's 42.88%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
20.34%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x SAND's 15.42%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-38886.99%
Negative yoy CapEx while SAND is 98.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-132.61%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -116.60%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-38037.27%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -134.71%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
78.80%
We repay more while SAND is negative at -240.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.