PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
10.43%
Some net income increase while SAND is negative at -127.41%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-6.50%
Negative yoy D&A while SAND is 2.44%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-813.04%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
64.04%
SBC growth while SAND is negative at -0.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
36.56%
Less working capital growth vs. SAND's 180.66%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
46.26%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. SAND's 146.86%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.75%
AP growth of 53.75% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-1330.88%
Negative yoy usage while SAND is 600.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
109.88%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SAND's 239.59%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
3.97%
Some CFO growth while SAND is negative at -6.92%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
98.29%
CapEx growth well above SAND's 99.08%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-101.73%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -1542.44%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-130.77%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -2567.02%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
13.95%
Debt repayment growth of 13.95% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.