PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.53%
Negative net income growth while SAND stands at 350.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.47%
Some D&A expansion while SAND is negative at -52.38%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
65.98%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. SAND's 492.60%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-0.72%
Negative yoy SBC while SAND is 0.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
93.25%
Slight usage while SAND is negative at -20.63%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-315.69%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SAND at -78.83%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
209.20%
AP growth of 209.20% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
48.86%
Growth well above SAND's 47.03%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-415.73%
Both negative yoy, with SAND at -65.74%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
3.56%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of SAND's 6.77%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
66.67%
Some CapEx rise while SAND is negative at -8716.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-494.12%
We reduce yoy other investing while SAND is 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-231.25%
We reduce yoy invests while SAND stands at 109.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
10.81%
Debt repayment well below SAND's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.