PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-306.84%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SAND at -85.15%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
24.09%
Some D&A expansion while SAND is negative at -75.00%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
18.64%
Some yoy growth while SAND is negative at -79.20%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
56.24%
SBC growth well above SAND's 0.21%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
1195.30%
Slight usage while SAND is negative at -67.73%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
234.43%
AR growth while SAND is negative at -201.79%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-154.67%
Negative yoy AP while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
328.50%
Some yoy usage while SAND is negative at -45.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
78913.17%
Well above SAND's 95.53%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
27.85%
Some CFO growth while SAND is negative at -16.90%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-16340.00%
Negative yoy CapEx while SAND is 46.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18431.68%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -101.93%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-18333.02%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -147.90%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
15.15%
Debt repayment growth of 15.15% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.