PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
739.91%
Some net income increase while SAND is negative at -9.17%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.08%
Less D&A growth vs. SAND's 16.74%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-100.59%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-89.79%
Negative yoy SBC while SAND is 23.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-165.93%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SAND is 461.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
127.57%
AR growth while SAND is negative at -47.95%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-162.36%
Negative yoy usage while SAND is 1872.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
58.14%
Well above SAND's 6.86%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
8.97%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SAND's 25.91%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
68.13%
Some CapEx rise while SAND is negative at -122888.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-125.79%
We reduce yoy other investing while SAND is 31.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-24.95%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -460.10%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
30.76%
Debt repayment growth of 30.76% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.