PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.41%
Some net income increase while SAND is negative at -294.54%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.89%
Some D&A expansion while SAND is negative at -5.64%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
344.84%
Some yoy growth while SAND is negative at -255.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
12.15%
SBC growth of 12.15% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
140.47%
Well above SAND's 92.89% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
496.51%
AR growth while SAND is negative at -1.47%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.63%
Growth well above SAND's 94.17%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-162.28%
Negative yoy while SAND is 1150.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
34.67%
Some CFO growth while SAND is negative at -1.89%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
50.79%
CapEx growth well above SAND's 99.54%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SAND at -82.23%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
97.55%
We have some outflow growth while SAND is negative at -331.79%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
90.40%
Investing outflow well above SAND's 66.10%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-14.38%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -227.27%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.