PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.54%
Net income growth under 50% of SAND's 73.80%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
0.18%
Some D&A expansion while SAND is negative at -11.05%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-76.49%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SAND stands at 6.88%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-649.14%
Negative yoy SBC while SAND is 1.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-295.69%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SAND is 228.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-3131.59%
AR is negative yoy while SAND is 261.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
147.24%
AP growth well above SAND's 2.56%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-1616.70%
Negative yoy usage while SAND is 4.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-919.60%
Both negative yoy, with SAND at -281.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-6.78%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SAND at -15.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
58.29%
CapEx growth of 58.29% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-214.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -164.32%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-101.56%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SAND at -22.90%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-188.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -1249.67%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-56.08%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -1197.04%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
99.91%
Debt repayment growth of 99.91% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-86.06%
Negative yoy issuance while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.