PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-18.77%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SAND at -23.32%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-21.66%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SAND at -2.24%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
148.87%
Some yoy growth while SAND is negative at -10.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
146.24%
SBC growth well above SAND's 0.39%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
156.82%
Slight usage while SAND is negative at -220.42%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
137.26%
AR growth while SAND is negative at -346.83%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
208.44%
A yoy AP increase while SAND is negative at -129.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
202.40%
Some yoy usage while SAND is negative at -130.76%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
166.77%
Well above SAND's 110.67%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-6.99%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SAND at -10.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
97.21%
CapEx growth well above SAND's 92.59%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-113.55%
Negative yoy purchasing while SAND stands at 53.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
138.24%
We have some liquidation growth while SAND is negative at -98.63%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
84.20%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SAND's 197.60%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
89.72%
Investing outflow well above SAND's 90.01%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-13.29%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-68.20%
Negative yoy issuance while SAND is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.