PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.33%
Negative net income growth while SAND stands at 334.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
14.34%
Some D&A expansion while SAND is negative at -0.83%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-70.04%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-268.04%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SAND at -0.40%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
146.27%
Less working capital growth vs. SAND's 358.02%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
186.50%
AR growth well above SAND's 223.11%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-274.44%
Negative yoy inventory while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
5.27%
Lower AP growth vs. SAND's 801.67%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-33.05%
Negative yoy usage while SAND is 819.70%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-55.38%
Both negative yoy, with SAND at -3357.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-1.99%
Negative yoy CFO while SAND is 48.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
66.20%
Some CapEx rise while SAND is negative at -1186.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.92%
Some yoy expansion while SAND is negative at -642.90%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while SAND is 1062.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
72.51%
We have mild expansions while SAND is negative at -693.03%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-1.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-69.57%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.