PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.44%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SAND at -106.53%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-4.62%
Negative yoy D&A while SAND is 9.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-203.03%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SAND stands at 131.90%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
9953.49%
SBC growth well above SAND's 5.34%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
14.17%
Less working capital growth vs. SAND's 41.70%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-1.54%
AR is negative yoy while SAND is 131.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
388.85%
Inventory growth well above SAND's 317.72%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-14.78%
Both negative yoy AP, with SAND at -317.72%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-37.48%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SAND at -318.40%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
57.18%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SAND's 159.21%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
11.35%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SAND's 4.69%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
283.86%
CapEx growth well above SAND's 81.87%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.73%
Purchases well above SAND's 7.04%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.14%
We reduce yoy other investing while SAND is 101.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
284.00%
Investing outflow well above SAND's 84.88%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
1.99%
We repay more while SAND is negative at -82.19%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
4483.93%
Issuance growth of 4483.93% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-4483.93%
We cut yoy buybacks while SAND is 147.61%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.