PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
26.98%
Some net income increase while SAND is negative at -82.74%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.16%
Less D&A growth vs. SAND's 52.74%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
193.24%
Some yoy growth while SAND is negative at -305.92%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-39.38%
Negative yoy SBC while SAND is 1.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
181.32%
Well above SAND's 247.86% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
151.10%
AR growth well above SAND's 206.16%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-70.23%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SAND at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
113.08%
Lower AP growth vs. SAND's 349.61%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-1069.64%
Negative yoy usage while SAND is 90.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
111.57%
Well above SAND's 18.87%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
49.79%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SAND's 5.56%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-174.62%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -252.91%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.62%
Some yoy expansion while SAND is negative at -804.57%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.11%
We reduce yoy other investing while SAND is 62.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-3.55%
We reduce yoy invests while SAND stands at 32.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
12.38%
We repay more while SAND is negative at -106.67%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-88.06%
Negative yoy issuance while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.