PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-17.73%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SAND at -99.48%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-5.58%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SAND at -21.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-16.14%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SAND stands at 90.21%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-3.30%
Negative yoy SBC while SAND is 0.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-129.02%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SAND at -146.09%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-266.58%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SAND at -117.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
172.76%
Inventory growth of 172.76% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
440.48%
A yoy AP increase while SAND is negative at -170.78%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
110.07%
Growth well above SAND's 80.61%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-44.47%
Negative yoy while SAND is 9.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-15.45%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SAND at -24.19%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-6.60%
Negative yoy CapEx while SAND is 76.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-100.07%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -100.07%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-16048.39%
Negative yoy purchasing while SAND stands at 8.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.07%
We reduce yoy sales while SAND is 157.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
157.57%
Growth well above SAND's 103.96%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-133.09%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -289.79%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
4.52%
Debt repayment well below SAND's 69.89%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
-92.39%
Negative yoy issuance while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
92.39%
Similar buyback growth to SAND's 85.09%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital return priorities or a stable free cash flow for both.