95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
26.42%
Some net income increase while SAND is negative at -44.83%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-45.54%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
54.27%
SBC growth well above SAND's 0.95%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
177.43%
Slight usage while SAND is negative at -347.91%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
93.29%
AR growth while SAND is negative at -281.80%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with SAND at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
393.87%
Growth of 393.87% while SAND is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
2.19%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SAND's 134.90%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
8.76%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of SAND's 17.44%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
32.51%
CapEx growth well above SAND's 20.32%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SAND at -22.52%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
13.54%
We have some outflow growth while SAND is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-123.72%
Both yoy lines negative, with SAND at -159.42%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-1.36%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SAND is 66.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.