PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-43.00%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SAND at -48.64%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-95.42%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SAND stands at 407.55%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-36.46%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SAND at -7.27%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
9.16%
Less working capital growth vs. SAND's 83.72%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
1691.76%
AR growth well above SAND's 85.11%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-137.15%
Negative yoy usage while SAND is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
156.30%
Well above SAND's 16.74%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
25.61%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SAND's 11.03%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-275.75%
Negative yoy CapEx while SAND is 95.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Some yoy expansion while SAND is negative at -186.50%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2979.51%
We reduce yoy other investing while SAND is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-301.07%
We reduce yoy invests while SAND stands at 207.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
200.67%
We repay more while SAND is negative at -166.67%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.