PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-75.96%
Negative revenue growth while AEM stands at 24.98%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-75.96%
Negative gross profit growth while AEM is at 4.85%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-97.83%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-97.83%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
182.08%
Net income growth above 1.5x AEM's 69.07%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
183.33%
EPS growth above 1.5x AEM's 69.47%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
183.33%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x AEM's 69.64%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.32%
OCF growth under 50% of AEM's 83.21%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
28.32%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x AEM's 19.78%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
6.51%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
6.51%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 12.03%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
6.51%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 94.30%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.03%
Firm’s AR is declining while AEM shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
3.80%
We show growth while AEM is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-2.62%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-0.62%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
339.85%
SG&A growth well above AEM's 72.34%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.