PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
35.21%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AEM's 23.20%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
35.21%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of AEM's 44.56%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
103.36%
EBIT growth below 50% of AEM's 239.19%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
103.36%
Operating income growth under 50% of AEM's 239.19%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
103.36%
Positive net income growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
103.35%
Positive EPS growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
103.35%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.25%
OCF growth under 50% of AEM's 324.84%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
86.25%
FCF growth 75-90% of AEM's 103.12%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
17.30%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
17.30%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 37.74%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
17.30%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 275.11%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.60%
AR growth of 24.60% while AEM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
10.87%
Inventory growth well above AEM's 5.33%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
5.90%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x AEM's 5.02%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
5.98%
Positive BV/share change while AEM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.38%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AEM's 49.65%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.