PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.05%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-15.05%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-31.12%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-31.12%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-25.48%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
171.04%
Positive EPS growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
171.04%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-185.05%
Negative OCF growth while AEM is at 126.96%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-185.05%
Negative FCF growth while AEM is at 50.30%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
35.12%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
35.12%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AEM's 45.71%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
15.00%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 6.39%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-224.40%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AEM stands at 116.45%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.74%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while AEM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-29.74%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while AEM is at 57.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-31.50%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while AEM is at 97.14%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.53%
AR growth of 32.53% while AEM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
17.35%
Inventory growth well above AEM's 7.00%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-13.66%
Negative asset growth while AEM invests at 2.40%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-23.19%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-163.74%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.