PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
38.65%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of AEM's 63.32%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
38.65%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AEM's 1235.50%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
73.73%
EBIT growth 50-75% of AEM's 147.36%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
73.73%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of AEM's 147.36%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
58.05%
Net income growth under 50% of AEM's 120.10%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
63.85%
EPS growth at 50-75% of AEM's 120.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
63.85%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of AEM's 120.00%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.32%
OCF growth under 50% of AEM's 649.41%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
98.32%
Positive FCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
82.36%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 1.19%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
82.36%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 156.73%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
36511827.79%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-150.28%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74837.44%
Positive short-term CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.79%
AR growth of 8.79% while AEM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
25.00%
Inventory growth well above AEM's 2.12%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
13.95%
Asset growth above 1.5x AEM's 5.69%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
15.43%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AEM's 1.49%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-11.33%
We’re deleveraging while AEM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
284.27%
SG&A growth well above AEM's 14.18%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.