PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-199.50%
Negative revenue growth while AEM stands at 18.15%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-199.50%
Negative gross profit growth while AEM is at 117.62%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-251.32%
Negative EBIT growth while AEM is at 288.60%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-251.32%
Negative operating income growth while AEM is at 288.60%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-511.39%
Negative net income growth while AEM stands at 441.03%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-511.27%
Negative EPS growth while AEM is at 435.71%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-511.27%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AEM is at 435.71%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1856.19%
OCF growth above 1.5x AEM's 63.63%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
1856.19%
FCF growth above 1.5x AEM's 87.89%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-278.69%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AEM stands at 57.79%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-278.69%
Negative 5Y CAGR while AEM stands at 191.51%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-36363820.17%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AEM stands at 53.83%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.92%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AEM stands at 691.87%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31219.63%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AEM is 3438.13%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while AEM stands at 11.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-41.90%
Negative asset growth while AEM invests at 0.80%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-33.48%
We have a declining book value while AEM shows 36.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-190.08%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.