PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.32%
EBIT growth 50-75% of AEM's 29.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
21.32%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of AEM's 29.42%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
-498.04%
Negative net income growth while AEM stands at 19.89%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-498.20%
Negative EPS growth while AEM is at 20.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-498.20%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AEM is at 20.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1345.03%
Positive OCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
1345.03%
Positive FCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AEM stands at 42.85%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y CAGR while AEM stands at 477.19%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AEM stands at 88.89%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3333.85%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 400.62%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1740.38%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AEM is 274.26%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
8252.36%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 70.17%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
8252.36%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 121.79%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
8577.55%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 65.50%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3578.51%
AR growth well above AEM's 11.74%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17000.92%
Asset growth above 1.5x AEM's 5.67%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
16152.91%
Positive BV/share change while AEM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.32%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.