PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.82%
Positive revenue growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
26.25%
Positive gross profit growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
25.56%
Positive EBIT growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
25.56%
Positive operating income growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
29.72%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x AEM's 22.44%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
33.33%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x AEM's 25.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
33.33%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x AEM's 25.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
0.01%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 0.10%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.53%
Diluted share count expanding well above AEM's 0.09%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.67%
Positive OCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
79.67%
Positive FCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
45.84%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 28.42%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-25.79%
Negative 5Y CAGR while AEM stands at 198.04%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
24.33%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 38.81%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
569.66%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1286.38%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 204.95%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
283.77%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 84.77%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.91%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while AEM stands at 2.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.18%
Asset growth above 1.5x AEM's 0.81%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.26%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AEM's 2.67%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.59%
We expand SG&A while AEM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.