PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.10%
Positive revenue growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
4.09%
Positive gross profit growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-47.73%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-47.73%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
4.94%
Positive net income growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.23%
Positive OCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
0.23%
Positive FCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
159.51%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to AEM's 153.11%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
191.27%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 123.30%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
245.23%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 46.36%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
257.85%
Below 50% of AEM's 545.93%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
2350.83%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 326.75%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
230.55%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 142.10%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
228.94%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 37.13%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1189.90%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 106.54%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
1571.05%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 64.70%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.21%
Firm’s AR is declining while AEM shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.73%
Asset growth above 1.5x AEM's 0.92%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
8.82%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AEM's 2.80%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-100.00%
We’re deleveraging while AEM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.23%
We expand SG&A while AEM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.