PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
26.85%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AEM's 1.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
32.57%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AEM's 12.09%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
31.93%
Positive EBIT growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
31.93%
Positive operating income growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
29.71%
Net income growth under 50% of AEM's 469.00%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
22.22%
EPS growth under 50% of AEM's 462.50%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AEM's 462.50%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.39%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AEM's 5.80%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
1.49%
Diluted share count expanding well above AEM's 2.96%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.93%
Positive OCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
26.93%
Positive FCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
196.70%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 602.04%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
135.29%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 118.12%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
137.47%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 50.20%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2148.09%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 732.96%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
271.35%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 122.14%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2063.83%
Below 50% of AEM's 4563.32%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
193.27%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 150.79%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1201.26%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 202.33%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
144.59%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of AEM's 163.05%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.70%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AEM's 67.02%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.67%
Asset growth well under 50% of AEM's 8.06%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.54%
Similar to AEM's 2.75%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-3.49%
We’re deleveraging while AEM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.77%
SG&A growth well above AEM's 77.52%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.