PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.56%
Negative revenue growth while AEM stands at 7.45%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
4.22%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of AEM's 6.65%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
-7.57%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-7.57%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
12.24%
Positive net income growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
18.18%
Positive EPS growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
10.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.85%
Negative OCF growth while AEM is at 24.18%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-3.85%
Negative FCF growth while AEM is at 33.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
184.72%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AEM's 277.01%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
151.42%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 134.81%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
127.75%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 19.02%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28313.94%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 5035.89%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
380.54%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 15.05%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2594.52%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 370.67%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
303.15%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 66.20%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1208.81%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 213.41%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
281.49%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 164.44%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.63%
Our AR growth while AEM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.23%
Negative asset growth while AEM invests at 3.07%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
4.09%
1.25-1.5x AEM's 3.24%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-7.99%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.22%
SG&A growth well above AEM's 44.53%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.