PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.49%
Positive revenue growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
1.48%
Positive gross profit growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
0.13%
Positive EBIT growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
0.13%
Positive operating income growth while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-16.66%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-23.08%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-18.18%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.21%
Share count expansion well above AEM's 0.24%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.66%
Reduced diluted shares while AEM is at 0.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.47%
OCF growth under 50% of AEM's 72.40%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
8.47%
Positive FCF growth while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
180.75%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to AEM's 171.24%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
89.12%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 59.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
92.51%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
629.21%
Below 50% of AEM's 2012.83%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
189.53%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to AEM's 191.41%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
475.60%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 228.54%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
158.49%
Positive short-term CAGR while AEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1024.24%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 213.66%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
261.75%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 158.36%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.98%
Firm’s AR is declining while AEM shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.52%
Asset growth above 1.5x AEM's 5.58%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-1.14%
We have a declining book value while AEM shows 0.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
27.56%
Debt growth of 27.56% while AEM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.92%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.