PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.31%
Revenue growth under 50% of AEM's 46.14%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
428.44%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AEM's 125.48%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
1191.12%
EBIT growth above 1.5x AEM's 272.18%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
1191.12%
Operating income growth above 1.5x AEM's 272.18%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
130.31%
Net income growth at 75-90% of AEM's 148.43%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
133.33%
EPS growth at 75-90% of AEM's 150.00%. Bill Ackman would push for improved profitability or share repurchases to catch up.
133.33%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of AEM's 150.00%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.83%
OCF growth under 50% of AEM's 205.12%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-7.04%
Negative FCF growth while AEM is at 61.54%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
80.53%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 265.49%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
201.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 25.38%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-0.28%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1448.55%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 190.14%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
13.81%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AEM's 69.39%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
163.84%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AEM's 133.45%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
-25.18%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2112.95%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AEM's 161.55%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
94.55%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to AEM's 102.19%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.40%
Our AR growth while AEM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.66%
Asset growth well under 50% of AEM's 7.43%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
27.41%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AEM's 4.01%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-58.40%
We’re deleveraging while AEM stands at 97.73%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.83%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AEM's 179.30%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.